European governments are stepping up efforts to reduce their dependence on U.S. data analytics company Palantir Technologies, reflecting a broader drive to strengthen the continent's digital sovereignty and develop home-grown alternatives for critical government and defence systems.
According to a report by POLITICO, policymakers across Europe are increasingly concerned that Palantir has become deeply embedded in sensitive sectors, including intelligence, policing, defence and healthcare, making governments heavily reliant on a foreign technology provider.
The issue gained renewed momentum after French and German security agencies announced plans last month to build a "European sovereign digital backbone." Industry observers viewed the initiative as a clear signal that Europe intends to lessen its reliance on Palantir.
The shift is already taking shape in several countries. Spain has reportedly instructed state-backed companies to exclude Palantir from future public procurement contracts, while France's domestic intelligence service has opted for French technology company ChapsVision instead of the U.S. firm. In the United Kingdom, the government is expected to review Palantir's £330 million National Health Service Federated Data Platform contract in early 2027.
Despite the political momentum, replacing Palantir is widely seen as a major challenge. The company's software plays a central role in analysing vast volumes of data, supporting intelligence operations, law enforcement and military planning. European officials acknowledge that few domestic competitors currently match Palantir's scale, technological maturity and operational experience.
Senior NATO officials have also stressed that no comparable alternative currently exists for some of Palantir's battlefield artificial intelligence capabilities, particularly its ability to integrate intelligence, identify targets and support military decision-making.
The debate has also extended beyond technology to concerns over strategic autonomy and governance. Some European lawmakers argue that reliance on software developed by major U.S. technology companies could undermine Europe's long-term technological independence, while others maintain that the primary issue is reducing structural dependence on foreign digital infrastructure rather than political ideology.
At the same time, Palantir continues to expand its presence in Europe. The company's software is used by a number of major European industrial firms, while its Maven Smart System recently became fully operational on NATO's classified network.
The report concludes that Europe's attempt to replace Palantir has become a broader test of its ambition to achieve digital sovereignty. Whether European governments can develop competitive alternatives is likely to determine how successfully the continent can reduce its dependence on U.S. technology in the era of artificial intelligence.
By Aghakazim Guliyev
